Hierarchy

Liderazgo necesario para pasar de jerarquía a una organización equilibrada de trabajo en red:

Para un trabajo organizacional en red equilibrado, se necesita un liderazgo transformacional que fomente la colaboración, la innovación y la transparencia. Los líderes deben ser facilitadores en lugar de controladores, promoviendo la autonomía y la auto-gestión dentro de los equipos. Es crucial que estos líderes comuniquen una visión compartida y desarrollen nuevos líderes a través de la capacitación y la mentoría.

Razones por las que las organizaciones de cooperación al desarrollo tienden a la jerarquía:

A pesar de sus principios de participación y horizontalidad, estas organizaciones tienden a la jerarquía debido a la necesidad de control y estabilidad. La jerarquía proporciona una estructura clara y definida, lo que facilita la supervisión y la rendición de cuentas. Además, la planificación rigurosa y a largo plazo es más fácil de implementar en una estructura jerárquica.
La baja rendición de cuentas interna puede deberse a la falta de transparencia y confianza dentro de la organización. En una estructura jerárquica, la información tiende a ser confidencial y compartida solo con quienes tienen la necesidad de saber, lo que puede limitar la rendición de cuentas inerna. Además, la resistencia al cambio y la desconfianza hacia los líderes pueden contribuir a esta problemática.

Cómo conseguir más coherencia y aumentar la rendición de cuentas interna de manera constructiva y empática:

1. Introduction

In today’s organizational world, traditional structures are being challenged by new paradigms that promote collaboration and agility. Two of these paradigms are hierarchy and networkarchy. While hierarchy relies on centralized control and rigorous planning, networkarchy fosters autonomy, innovation, and transparency. This post explores these two approaches, their implications for development and international cooperation organizations, and how organizations can transition from one paradigm to the other.

2. Description and Comparison of Paradigms

Organizations can operate under two main paradigms: hierarchy and networkarchy. Below is a detailed comparison of both paradigms:

Aspect	Hierarchy (1)	Redarchy (2)
Approach	Individual	Collective
Control	Centralized control	Autonomy and self-management
Planning	Rigorous and long-term	Agility and adaptability
Innovation	Limited and controlled	Promoted and experimental
Information	Privacy and confidentiality	Transparency and openness

Hierarchy :

Individual : In this paradigm, the focus is on the individual and his or her position within a clearly defined structure. Each person has a specific role and delimited responsibilities.
Control : Hierarchy is based on control and supervision. Decisions are made at the higher levels and implemented at the lower levels.
Planning : Planning is rigorous and long-term. Clear objectives are set and strict procedures are followed.
Secure : The priority is to ensure stability and minimize risks. Innovation is limited and controlled.
Privacy : Information is handled confidentially and shared only with those who have a need to know.

Redarchy :

Collective : The focus is on the collective. Decisions are made collaboratively and the contribution of all members is valued.
Autonomy : Autonomy and self-management are encouraged. Teams have the freedom to make decisions and adapt quickly to changes.
Agility : Agility is key. Network-based organizations are flexible and can pivot quickly in response to new opportunities or challenges.
Innovate : Innovation is central. Members are encouraged to experiment and come up with new ideas.
Transparency : Transparency is key. Information is shared openly and trust and collaboration are promoted.

3. Impact on NGOs and International Cooperation

NGOs and multilateral and bilateral cooperation agencies, which operate under the paradigm of hierarchy, tend to be more structured and controlled. This can result in slower decision-making and less adaptability to rapid changes. However, they ensure stability and clarity in roles and responsibilities.

On the other hand, organizations that adopt networkarchy are more agile and able to innovate quickly. This allows them to better adapt to changing contexts and take advantage of new opportunities. However, they may face challenges in coordination and managing internal conflicts due to the greater autonomy of teams.

Sigue leyendo →